Compare international and local curricula through learning approach, assessment, subject choice, mobility and university progression.
Compare learning design, not just programme names.
Review how subjects are taught, how students are assessed, how much choice is available and how the programme supports independent learning. The same curriculum can feel very different in two schools.
Understand the stage of each pathway.
IB programmes cover different age ranges, while the Cambridge Pathway progresses from early years through advanced qualifications. Local curricula may provide stronger integration with the destination's language and public system.
Test the next transition.
Ask whether the student is likely to remain, move countries again or apply to university in a particular system. Subject prerequisites and assessment evidence should support that next step.
Recognition is necessary, but fit still matters.
A recognised qualification does not automatically make its teaching style, workload or subject structure suitable for every student.
Compare the school's delivery.
Check authorisation or accreditation, teacher continuity, subject availability, counselling, language support, results context and how the school manages students entering mid-pathway.
Source review: 2026-08-11. Programme structures were reviewed against the International Baccalaureate and Cambridge International. Confirm each school's authorised offer directly.